Author: Rachel Barnhart
The City of Rochester denied our appeal for the sources of outside income for elected officials and the deputy mayor. The sources of income were redacted for many officials on the annual financial disclosure forms we obtained through open records.
The city claimed revealing the sources of outside income would “constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The city’s position is the public is only entitled to know if officials are paid by an entity doing business with the city.
Robert Freeman, the director of the Committee on Open Government, disagrees with the city’s position.
“The sources of income may be significant, not only if there’s actual conflict, but the appearance of conflict,” Freeman said. If an official has income from a company, “(Sources of income) may color a person’s point of view. That makes the source of the assets relevant even if the company involved does not do business with the city today.”
Governments are allowed to redact information that is an unwarranted invasion of privacy. But Freeman noted, “There are any number of judicial decisions that public employees have less privacy than anyone else. Why? Because we are more accountable.”
Freeman also pointed to Rochester’s City Charter, which states the city can withhold the amounts of the income, but it says nothing about withholding the source.
This is the first year city officials have had to disclose all sources of outside income.
4 thoughts on “City Denies Appeal for Information on Officials’ Outside Income”
Sandy Mayer says:
Rachel, it’s taken a while but I’m finally coming around to seeing your side of the story and how we need to be vigilant the way our city is run. A FOIL is NOT a FOIL if it’s all blacked out. What are they hiding? With recent news on the Rochester Housing Commission and now the report on our city schools, I look forward to joining you in keeping our public officials and boards accountable.
Rochester For All says:
Thank you. Another way to look at accountability is making sure the public has faith in the system. There is so much cynicism, which leads to low participation and acceptance of poor results and corruption. – Rachel
Michael Yarger says:
Is there a significant cost to filing all these FOIL requests?
Rochester For All says:
It adds up. .25 a page. I’m figuring out a model to continue this work. Will be relaunching this organization has something else soon. Stay tuned! – Rachel